SellerPic AI vs. Higgsfield AI Canvas – Jewelry Product Placement Battle
In this tutorial, we will be putting two AI product placement tools to test – SellerPic AI and the all new Higgsfield AI Canvas. We will try to place complex looking jewelry onto a model. Who will win this product placement battle? Let’s find out! Here’s the video:
Video Summary
This video compares SellerPic AI and Higgsfield AI Canvas to determine which tool handles complex product placement better, using a necklace and earrings as test subjects.
Summary of Findings:
- SellerPic AI Performance:
- The tool produced a decent result for the earrings but struggled with the necklace’s accuracy. Specifically, it incorrectly extended the line of gemstones where a gold chain should have been [02:12].
- Attempts to fix the error using the “image retouch” feature failed because the tool relies solely on text prompts for inpainting and does not accept reference images for corrections [03:02].
- Higgsfield AI Canvas Performance:
- Higgsfield generated a higher-quality, more realistic image for the necklace compared to SellerPic but initially suffered from similar accuracy issues with the gemstone count [05:07].
- The “inpainting with reference” feature allowed for more precise corrections by uploading a cropped image of the chain, though it still required multiple attempts [06:02].
- However, the tool performed poorly when placing the earrings, producing lower-quality results than SellerPic [06:48].
- Final Verdict & Recommendation:
- Neither tool was perfect for complex jewelry. The best final image was created by combining the earrings from SellerPic and the necklace from Higgsfield using Photoshop [07:20].
- Recommendation: Use Higgsfield ($9/mo) for simple products. SellerPic ($29/mo) is recommended for better consistency across a wider range of products [07:49].
Important Links
Link to SellerPic AI:
Link to download the image shown in the video:
Link to Higgsfield AI:
